Piers Morgan DESTROYED By Cornel West Over Gaza: ‘Yes Or No?’

 

 

Transcript

Intro

0:04

nous Pierce Morgan loves to ask people

0:07

if they'll condemn Hamas yes or no yes

0:09

or no yes or no and here's a clip of you

0:11

asking Pierce Morgan to answer a

0:13

question yes or no uh let's see let's

0:17

see how that goes well they've let's be

Cornel calls out Pier's Hypocrisy

0:20

clear let's be clear they've and this is

0:22

uh Pierce Morgan talking about Hamas

0:24

when he says they merge is a terrorist

0:26

terrorist organization committing acts

0:29

of mass terrorism I mean that's what

0:31

they are Hamas is a counterterrorist

0:34

group responding to the terrorism of the

0:37

IDF and responding to the terrorism of

0:39

the Israeli State a counterterrorist

0:42

group can can can can commit war crimes

0:44

brother but they they didn't initiated

0:46

at all if they're founded

0:49

1988 and the terrorism began in 1948

0:53

with the state of Israel that's 40 whole

0:55

years let's keep in mind I think it's a

0:58

stretch to call them count

1:01

under the PLO undermine secular

1:04

nationalism promote fundamentalist Islam

1:08

as a way of dividing Palestinians that's

1:10

why Nathan yahu allowed for Gaza but

1:13

allowed for Hamas to gain to to gain

1:16

access to the money from Qatar and

1:18

others keep the Palestinians divided and

1:21

therefore not having to move to deal

1:23

with the West there are look there are

1:25

many things that we would find agreement

1:27

on about the way Palestinians have been

1:29

treated for a very long time it has been

1:32

a completely unacceptable occupation

1:35

should not the but hang on hang on let

1:38

me I know let me finish but the ideaa

1:41

that you categorize Hamas after October

1:43

7th as counter terrorists is ridiculous

1:45

they are terrorists and they should be

1:47

called what they are anyway let me ask

1:49

you this do do you think the IDF is

1:51

terrorist when they kill innocent

1:53

Palestinians do you I think it depends

1:55

yes or no my brother yes or no well okay

1:57

I I would ask you this if you no yes or

2:01

no you're uncensored you're uncensored

2:03

my brother I've been asked this question

2:05

before I have actually tweeted in 2014

2:08

which I thought was so refreshing

2:09

because you never hear people ask yes or

2:11

no can is Israel terrorist or what they

2:13

doing terrorist and of course you you

2:15

can't if you say what Hamas

2:19

did what Israel is doing is not

2:21

terrorism and you've been very

2:23

consistent you you distinguish between

2:25

killing civilians and killing combatants

2:28

whichit you know which is a framework of

2:30

international human rights law but I

2:33

thought it was interesting that you got

2:35

him unable to respond to this even as he

2:39

on every almost every episode he's done

2:42

on this subject Corners people with a

2:44

yes or no and then he tries to throw it

2:46

back to you with a a challenge and this

2:48

was great too I tweeted that what Israel

2:50

was doing then was bordering on

2:52

terrorism I'm not afraid of using that

2:54

analogy bordering on terrorism the

2:56

children are being killed right yes of

2:58

course there were children killed in

2:59

October oober the 7th I have serious

3:01

misgivings about what's happening

3:03

currently in Gaza like most people but

3:05

what I would say to you if you were the

3:08

head of the Israeli government on

3:10

October the 7th out of Interest what

3:13

would your response have been to that

3:15

horrendous terror attack well I I'll

3:18

tell you the answer to that question but

3:19

I don't know why you just can't say the

3:20

IDF is terrorist killing and innocent

3:22

people bordering on it it's wrong no why

3:26

you're uncensored you're a free man tell

3:29

the truth from tell Tru let me tell you

3:31

what I would what I would do if I was in

3:33

Israel I would end the occupation I

3:36

would end The Siege I was saying I'm

3:38

committed to Palestinian dignity I'm

3:40

committed to Palestinian equality and we

3:43

Palestinians and Israelis we Jews and

3:46

and and and and Palestinians we're going

3:48

to learn how to live together in a

3:50

context of equality and dignity we're

3:53

going to have Jewish safety we're going

3:54

to have Jewish security that's the very

3:56

end and aim of Israel we'll never see an

3:59

annihilation of Jews we'll never see

4:01

another Massacre or holy CA of Jews but

4:03

we'll never see Annihilation and

4:05

Massacre and and and and and and and and

4:08

vicious attacks on Palestinians e that's

4:11

what I would do not just as head of

4:13

Israel that's what I do in the White

4:15

House brother that's what I'll do the

4:17

White House and I'll explain to American

4:19

people why it is that Biden and Harris

4:22

and others continue to enable this

4:24

genocide and then when they finally say

4:26

ceasefire they act like they ought we

4:28

ought to give them a moral PR I

4:30

appreciate your moral Clarity there in

4:33

response to that often rhetorical

4:35

question of what is Israel supposed to

4:37

do undermine the conditions that make

4:40

possible this kind of domination

4:45

occupation make sure you keep track of

4:47

the humanity beginning with the least of

4:50

these that's biblical for me which are

4:52

the oppressed and then make a space in

4:56

which oppress and oppressor can in fact

4:59

call in question that distinction and

5:01

attempt to live a life together and

5:04

that's why I'm thoroughly convinced that

5:06

the uh that the two- party solution

5:08

really even again that Biden and and and

5:11

Harris are talking about is is

5:14

relatively empty it's too late there's

5:17

too many settler uh colonialists who've

5:19

taken the land so that you end up giving

5:22

the Palestinians something like a banan

5:25

state a highly marginalized entity of

5:28

which there

5:30

Israeli Supremacy so that Israeli will

5:32

continually be have them under

5:35

surveillance have them under their power

5:39

with a little small entity they call a

5:41

state and then say you ought to be

5:43

satisfied with it no I'm not going for

5:45

that that is it's very interesting to me

5:48

that uh people of other is just in

5:51

Dallas had a wonderful wonderful uh

5:54

Gathering uh at a rally and people had a

5:57

big again controversy about this this

6:00

phrase To The River To The Sea you said

6:02

well right now you've got aarti from the

6:06

river to the

6:07

sea no not controversial but when you

6:10

say River to the sea oh you mean

6:12

annihilation of Jews no no we're not

6:14

going we don't have any Pati for

Cornel calls out the hypocrisy of Zionism

6:16

annihilation of Jews or anybody else but

6:19

if the alternative is River to the sea

6:21

with aarth versus River to the sea with

6:25

a secular state which one has a

6:28

moral character to it which one has

6:30

ethical content to it how do we deal

6:34

with these non-negotiables what I call

6:36

non-negotiables which is Palestinian

6:38

dignity and equality and Jewish security

6:41

and and safety there will never be

6:44

Israeli safety there'll never be

6:46

security for Jewish brothers and sisters

6:48

as long as they are occupying dominating

6:50

subjugating marginalizing and degrading

6:53

and outright hating Palestinians then

6:56

they get upset when Palestinians hate

6:58

back well I don't believe people are to

6:59

hate at all but I know people do hate

7:01

back you terrorize people do terrorize

7:04

back there's no doubt about that and

7:06

we've had these discussions in the black

7:08

Freedom Movement my dear sister you know

7:11

was you know Nat Turner and Denmark vzy

7:14

and John Brown white brother were they

7:17

justified in killing uh uh White

7:20

innocent children well that's a serious

7:22

debate the Frederick Douglas and the

7:23

boys and others that we got

7:25

disagreements with that I tend to be

7:27

very very uh purist about that I don't

7:30

think we should ever kill innocent

7:32

people ever kill innocent children if

7:34

you do you ought to recognize that's a

7:36

crime against humanity you don't just do

7:38

it and walk walk around as if this is

7:41

just what resistance is all about no you

7:43

got to make some moral distinctions are

7:45

you going to end up killing innocent

7:46

Palestinians who disagree with you you

7:48

end up killing innocent innocent Arabs

7:51

who disagree with you you got to have

7:52

some moral Corp but I do understand and

7:55

here France Von's point is a powerful

7:57

one that you don't have control over

8:00

this thing and when violence is so

8:03

deeply inculcated in the structures of a

8:06

society thepress are going to speak the

8:09

language of those who are coming at them

8:12

Malcolm X has a powerful Point France

8:14

fenon does too and they're not the only

8:17

two so you have to be cognizant of that

8:19

but I'm holding on to moral some some

8:22

morality and spirituality and of course

8:24

as you know sometimes my left comrad say

8:27

oh brother West are you talking about

8:29

both sides I can't stand this both Sidis

8:33

I understand that point right you can

8:36

use both Sider ISM

8:39

downplay the nature of the domination

8:42

downplay the structures of Oppression

8:45

and downplaying the fact that resistance

8:48

movements of oppressed people takes a

8:50

variety of different forms there's no

8:53

doubt about that now I'm not a pacifist

8:55

like Martin and King and tutu and others

8:57

I believe combatants uh can kill other

9:00

combat and you try to kill other combats

9:03

but of course you know War since World

9:05

War well war going back to the genocide

9:09

against brothers and sisters in the

9:11

Congo under leopo Belgium he just

9:14

killing innocent folks in such a massive

9:16

way that people say well come on brother

9:19

West man everybody's killing innocent

9:21

folk everybody gonna do that wh why why

9:25

you have all of this equivocation and so

9:27

forth I said no you know I'm I'm not

9:30

I'm not

9:31

necessarily better than anybody in any

9:34

deep sense I just want to have a witness

9:36

that has some kind of morality and

9:38

spirituality tied to it even as I'm

9:41

cognizant of just how vicious and ugly

9:43

and beastial and barbaric uh these

9:46

genocides and ethnic cleansings and

9:48

subjugation and

9:49

colonization has in fact been and you

9:52

can imagine you know that's the kind of

9:53

thing we could talk about a long long

9:56

time very well I think there's a

9:58

difference between

10:00

moral consistency in both siding I think

10:02

the danger if you say life is precious

10:06

there's a difference between killing

10:07

civilians and killing combatants and

10:10

both sides are doing it which is not

10:12

what you're saying I mean you I've heard

10:13

you say that you have a larger

10:15

indictment I believe that was your word

10:17

your indictment of is larger of Israel

10:19

because they are committing more of

10:21

these crimes but I think that and you

10:23

also are pointing out that what do you

10:26

think is going to happen when you are

10:28

inflicting violence on the daily level

10:30

and a structural level um how do you

10:32

expect people to respond uh and there's

10:35

a lot of nonviolent resistance from

10:37

Palestinians no one ever talks about

10:39

that that's exactly right I mean in my

10:41

radical King book I make the connections

10:44

between the I mean the anti the first

10:46

anti was nonviolent second antii was

10:49

primarily

10:51

nonviolent and and of course we also

10:54

have to tell the truth about the ways in

10:56

which the American Empire and and and

10:59

the and Israeli U uh Elite tried to

11:03

repress suppress and Crush PLO which was

11:07

a secular leftist movement which was

11:10

nationalist but tied to leftist analysis

11:13

and used fundamentalist Islam as a

11:18

replacement thinking that somehow that

11:20

was going to be either easier to control

11:24

or it was somehow going to be something

11:26

that uh allowed them to get away with

11:29

with their colonial position their their

11:33

position as in this case oppressors v

11:36

oppressed and it it backfired on it it's

11:39

part of the blowback we saw it in

11:41

Afghanistan you see it in in the Middle

11:43

East you see it in Egypt across across

11:46

the Middle East you crush the leftist

11:49

possibilities right you support

11:52

that's Saddam Hussein and Bin Laden all

11:56

of them were on CIA payt right because

12:00

they they they they were being

12:02

manipulated by these Imperial Powers

12:06

Senate in Washington DC and then it

12:09

backfires on them and they become

12:12

anti-American Empire which is not

12:14

Anti-Imperialist as a whole because they

12:17

could be tied to other kind of

12:18

imperialism and that's a complicated

12:20

thing

12:28

too

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Popular posts from this blog

Video: A legal masterpiece from Ralph Wilde on behalf of the Arab League - with Transcript

Israel, Gaza and the Anatomy of Genocide