Video Infoblog: "Israel Started This War" John Mearsheimer DESTROYS Piers Morgan on Iran-Israel War, Gaza, plus more

 

 

 

 

Transcript

0:00

I try not to watch Piers Morgan the infamous uh uk-based

0:07

commentator who has made essentially a living promoting a kind of liberal

0:16

justification for the US and UK and essentially the collective West's

0:22

Imperial regime and this has not been any more clear or Stark and Preps just absolutely

0:31

grotesquely so then in Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza he has made a

0:38

name in lowkey British uh Iraqi rapper has been on this program more than a few

0:45

times talking about how Piers Morgan has pretty deep connections to the Israeli

0:52

side but nonetheless he has played this role of being kind of a middleman someone who POS poses as a good-hearted

1:00

fellow that uh just continuously rebrands Israel the United States and

1:07

the UK's talking points to justify this ongoing catastrophe in Gaz as well as

1:15

its Regional implications well Piers Morgan has of course interviewed people like Norman finlin and uh hosted debates

1:23

including people like Norman finlin the uh Infamous Professor former Professor

1:29

who is an expert on the situation in Gaza and it hasn't gone so well for

1:37

Pierce Morgan well he met his match in incredibly so from political scientists

1:45

the renowned political scientist John Mir shimer and John mimer came on the

1:53

Piers Morgan show and absolutely destroyed anything and everything that

1:59

Piers Morgan tried to throw at him and I wanted to cover this because we are hearing a narrative of late both in

2:07

regards to Israel what it's doing in Gaza as well as what the United States

2:13

Israel and of course the collective West are doing in the Middle East to Iran for example a narrative that says that the

2:22

United States in the west and Israel all have a duty even if it's not correct how

2:29

they go about this duty but they have a duty to ensure that future war crimes

2:39

that future catastrophes that future disasters in the region are prevented

2:45

from these evil barbaric forces whether it be Hamas or Iran Etc and I want to

2:53

play you how John mimer answered this because I thought it was an absolutely

2:58

brilliant segment and I have more than than a few of these so let me pull up

3:03

the first okay so let's see if I got this right one here here we go yes so

3:11

here's what he had to say when Piers Morgan and this is from fukan goes aara who says Piers Morgan tried to justify

3:19

what Israel is doing by saying how does any country defend itself without committing war crimes and so here is

3:25

what Sean Mir Mar to say this is what we hear a lot in the Narrative of the

3:30

collective west of the neocons right that unless you commit war crimes unless

3:35

you meet so-called force with force and I think even that's a simp oversimplification when it comes to

3:41

what's going on in Gaza you have to respond with equal if not greater force

3:47

because that is for the greater good so here's how John Mir shimer answered that that's us off the hook how does any

3:53

country defend itself from an existential threat like the Nazis then by your by your categorization without

4:01

committing war crimes well if you look at how the

4:07

Soviets who were basically responsible for defeating the Nazis uh in World War

4:13

II uh they did not commit many war crimes in the process of defeating the

4:21

Vermont it was basically a ground war where the Soviets uh uh the Red Army

4:29

rolled up the Vermont there were no bombing of cities there were no dropping of nuclear

4:36

weapons so in a sense what John mimer is saying and responding to because they've

4:41

been talking about Israel okay they've been talking about what Israel is doing

4:47

and of course Piers Morgan does that I'm not for all these killings of children but war crimes are going to happen bad

4:53

things are going to happen in response to October 7th this has been Piers Morgan's justification

5:00

for Israel from the very beginning and John M right away pulls out a deep historical example and says the Soviet

5:07

Union did not drop bombs on civilians to

5:12

defeat Nazis they did not do that they did not drop bombs on civilians what

5:19

they did is they f a ground war directly against Nazi forces and defeated them at

5:25

the great cost of the Soviets so of of the Red Army so let's continue now

5:31

there's no question that there was a lot of rape and pillaging especially at the end uh as the Red Army moved into

5:38

Germany but aside from that this was not uh a uh purposeful campaign to murder

5:47

huge numbers of civilians so you can fight a war on the ground involving two

5:53

armies that basically avoids uh the problem of bombing city

5:59

and murdering huge numbers of civilians what if what if the Nazis are bombing

6:04

cities as they were what do you mean I'm

6:11

not the Battle of Britain the blitz I mean if they're going to send over bombers and just attack cities in the

6:17

way that they did how do you defend yourself without committing war crimes by your by your

6:23

assessment well the British defended themselves with fighter aircraft the RAF

6:29

ended off the lvfa and won the Battle of Britain the the RAF the British did not

6:36

commit war crimes uh to defeat the LT bafa in the Battle of Britain uh there's

6:42

no question that the RAF uh at different points in the war purposely targeted

6:48

German cities and purposely tried uh to murder large numbers of British

6:54

civilians you know the story of bomber Harris for sure but that's not happened

7:00

in the Battle of Britain and my only point is if you talk about what balber Harris did and the RAF did against

7:06

German cities this was a war crime they were purposely bombing working class areas in German

7:12

cities a big one was Dresden I mean firebombing tens of thousands in the Royal Air Force the RF as May shimer is

7:20

calling it was absolutely a part was the biggest part to that the United States helped out but uh the uh British Air

7:28

Force just absolutely level Dresden killed tens of

7:34

thousands because that they believed would maximize that strategy would

7:39

maximize the number of civilians well it wasn't as simple as that were they because they were deliberately targeting industrial cities in the main which were

7:45

being used to build Munitions as well so there was a legitimate reason to Target these but that was the case in many

7:52

cases that's not true yes it is no but no I mean what happened was that the

8:00

British quickly found out and this is what happened to us when we bombed Japan

8:05

we quickly found out that bombing economic and Military targets didn't work I could walk you through the story

8:11

about the bombing of Japanese cities like Tokyo it just it didn't work and the reason we turned to bombing

8:18

civilians to killing civilians when we bombed Japan and this was true with regard to bomber Harris is that bombing

8:26

economic targets did so that's one part of this okay and I thought it was

8:32

brilliant to bring up the Soviet example because it is so true that the Soviets

8:38

gave up basically everything to fight that kind of war and uh you know it cost

8:45

tens of millions 27 million Soviets died but it did lead to a reduction that

8:51

wasn't the Soviets going in and just dropping bombs like Israel is doing on Gaza right now so that that that is just

8:58

no justification and and that is the narrative we keep hearing over and over

9:03

and over again um

9:10

so so I want to play another this might overlap because the segments were kind of hard to organize but let me play you

9:18

another segment here all right so here is more okay um no let's not do this

9:24

okay let's go to the Iran piece so I think we got enough of Mir Shai

9:30

just absolutely blowing the lid off of how it just there's no justifications

9:36

what Piers Morgan was basically saying there is that you have to do what Nazis

9:42

do in order to defeat Nazis that is essentially the argument so that's basically saying the Soviets the United

9:49

States the Verity allies in World War II that's what they did not so simple

9:54

although the US of course committed grave war crimes in Japan for

10:00

example but now we're going to get in the issue of Iran because of

10:08

course here's Morgan takes a very hard stance on Iran and has been using Iran

10:17

as a way to justify of course once again what Israel is doing by putting a

10:23

liberal face on it and here is what John mimer had to say about the situation

10:29

there so here we gois who started this by bombing the

10:34

Iranian Embassy in Damascus uh the Iranians did not start

10:40

this conflict that recently took place between April 1st and April 19 they were

10:45

there with with people from Hezbollah weren't they so they were they were military leaders using the consulate to

10:51

plan attacks on Israel with leaders of Hezbollah I mean that was why they were

10:57

targeted look in inter interntional law and according to International Norms

11:03

states don't attack uh the embassies of other states this was considered to be a

11:09

significant provocation unless they're being used by unless they're being used as military bases no Piers Morgan keeps on doing

11:17

this this has been the narrative too from the collective west from the foreign policy neocon establishment what

11:23

they say is that of course embassies are protected property that under

11:29

international law there is to be no striking embassies during open conflicts

11:35

any kind of conflict except Piers Morgan and others will say the apologists of

11:42

War essentially World War these apologists they'll say except for if

11:47

there's military planning no actually doesn't matter if there's military

11:52

planning if there's anything going on there they're still protected every

11:58

single us Embassy on this planet every single one is used for

12:06

military purposes there is not a US Embassy on this planet that isn't used

12:11

for military purposes and why is that because the United States doesn't do diplomacy US embassies in Colombia all

12:19

across Latin America are used for military and intelligence purposes all

12:24

across the Middle East all across West Asia try to go to a usnbc in Saudi Arabia and tell me that there isn't

12:31

military activity going on there go to US Embassy in Israel and tell me that military activity isn't going on there

12:38

it's Preposterous it it happens all the time there have been literal coups in regime change operations that have been

12:44

planted out of US embassies this was the case especially during Dirty Wars in

12:50

Latin America and the Caribbean throughout the 19 uh uh 50s 60s 7s 80s

12:56

90s ask Chile what role the US Embassy played in the overthrow of p uh

13:04

overthrow P Salvador yende which installed Pino the fascist dictator I think Chileans would say well

13:11

the US Embassy played a very nefarious role by essentially acting as a conduit

13:17

for arms training intelligence it happens every it happens operation

13:22

Phoenix came out of so-called Indochina US embassies in Vietnam and Cambodia

13:29

this is a long history but here's Piers Morgan saying oh you can just bomb them you can just

13:35

bomb the US uh Israel they can just bomb embassies whenever they feel like

13:40

there's military activity happening within them anyway here's Mir shimer to continue which it is beli certainly

13:46

Israel argues I don't listen I don't know but it's certainly been argued by Israel that there were it was being used

13:53

part of this consulate area was being used as a genuine military base in which case it becomes legitimate Target if

14:00

indeed they are meeting with Hezbollah to plan attacks on Israel isn't

14:05

it there's no evidence that it was being used as a military base and the fact is

14:11

that if the Israelis are going to hit the Iranian Embassy the end result is the Iranians are going to retaliate and

14:17

they did retaliate now I want to say a few words about that retaliation it's very important to understand that the

14:23

Americans and the Iranians orchestrated the Iranian attack so that it would be a

14:29

limited attack it would do very little damage to Israel and the reason this is

14:35

the case is that neither the Iranians or the United States wanted this conflict

14:41

and it was the Israelis who by attacking the Iranian Embassy in Damascus dragged

14:47

the Americans and uh the Iranians into this conflict and what we tried to do

14:53

working with the Iranians before the attack on uh April 14th and during the

15:00

attack on April 14th was to do everything possible to keep it limited

15:06

and avoid escalation so I mean John Mir shimer

15:12

just speaking the truth I mean John Mir shimer especially since the conflict in Ukraine jumped off but it's but even

15:20

more so since Israel launched its genocidal Onslaught I've been you follow him on Judge nap's show and wherever

15:28

else he's doing interview I've tried to get him on here but um you know very busy guy uh but nonetheless if you

15:35

follow his work and his interviews it's just become more and more solid on these issues and when it comes to Iran this is

15:42

exactly right this this was a limited strike that Iran conducted on Israel

15:47

that did penetrate the Dome it did cause damage to military installations inside of Israel no matter how many times they

15:53

try to say it didn't but the United States and Israel were in deep communication through

15:59

mediators and they essentially uh agreed to a limited

16:05

attack that wouldn't escalate the situation in the region and that would

16:11

give Iran what it wanted deterrence and also give the United States a way out of

16:17

further uh becoming beleaguered in some kind of Quagmire that it already really

16:23

is in so this was the reality that Iran

16:29

throughout this iteration of us in Israeli

16:35

aggression it has been the one to behave sanely and rationally with both reality

16:43

and humanity and the region and Palestine all on its mind meanwhile you

16:49

have Piers Morgan trying to say without any evidence that Iran was planning

16:55

military operations out of this Embassy and let's be real of course there was

17:01

Iranian revolutionary guard corpse of course the there were several military advisors some of Iran's top commanders

17:08

inside of the AL alouds Force which is the essentially the regional wide uh

17:16

Force which fights on behalf of uh the Palestinian people as well as uh

17:25

whichever part of this region is Under Siege from aggression especially foreign

17:32

aggression it played a key role of course in the fight against Isis and

17:37

these jihadist groups Etc so you could say because they were there that

17:44

military activity was being planned but there's no proof and even if there was

17:51

proof it would still be a war crime and it would still justify and warrant an

17:59

Iranian response so whoever demonizes Pi Morgan people like Piers Morgan when

18:05

they demonize Iran for taking a rightful response to a war crime against it one

18:13

that was limited and one that essentially in many respects uh uh uh uh

18:19

helped take the planet off the brink of a potential nuclear and Regional

18:25

disaster for those like Pi Morgan who stir up the pot and try to demonize Iran

18:31

all they are doing is creating further conditions for something like this to

18:37

happen again for Israel to essentially have cart blanch uh rubber stamp

18:42

permission to commit war crimes of this nature which takes us to the brink of a

18:48

World War in West Asia or at least a world war that it's that has a focal

18:54

point in West Asia so that's the reality but John Mir shimer just absolutely uh uh was

19:03

incredible in outlining these points to Piers Morgan

19:09

and just I I mean this is just how it is for Piers Morgan right just completely

19:15

outclass there is just no uh uh there's just

19:22

no how should I say uh no question about

19:28

where Pierce Morgan stands there's no question about John Meyer's uh uh Intelligence on these

19:36

matters but I do have I did have one more clip on this that I wanted to show

19:41

but it does overlap with one of the last ones so I want to just fast forward through

19:47

it here we go here we

19:56

go all right all right right so we're going to listen to one more clip from John Mir shimer on this question okay so

20:04

I just had to fast forward a little

20:15

bit okay it's not working for some reason all right let me

20:22

refresh here we go if you categorize it all

20:27

civilian so we're going to get more into this question so this can include uh

20:33

what Israel did to Iran right and this can also include what Israel is doing to Gaza because they're having this

20:39

conversation about the broader situation so here we go if you categorize it all civilian deaths in a in a war like that

20:45

is murder you're effectively saying that every one of those deaths is a crime I would not argue that what the Allies did

20:51

in response to what the nais and the Japanese were doing was a crime necessarily they were responding to an

20:57

existential threat to of the world including mass murder of civilians as we saw the Holocaust so a response is not

21:05

is not necessarily murder is it's effectively self-defense the question you have to ask yourself is whether or

21:11

not you think because the Nazis were committing genocide because the Nazis

21:16

were committing mass murder in Europe that that justifies bombing German

21:22

cities and purposely killing huge numbers of civilians uh do you think

21:27

that let you off the hook that's the argument you're making you're saying that because the Germans were so

21:33

horrible we were allowed to be horrible ourselves but we weren't as horrible as

21:38

the Germans and furthermore we were doing this in self-defense that's the argument you're making yeah and what I'm

21:44

saying is I understand that there are strategic imperatives for killing

21:50

civilians right this is why we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nuclear

21:55

weapons we thought that it made good strategic sense and that it would save American lives especially those GIS who

22:02

would have to invade the Japanese home Islands but I still think that that is a

22:08

case of war crimes and uh and I think that to use your rhetoric uh lets us off

22:15

the hook how does any country defend itself from an existential threat like the Nazis then by your by your

22:22

categorization without committing war crimes well if you look at how the Soviets who all right so that we already

22:28

went through that part but I think he did a masterful job of going over this

22:35

point about how war crimes are war crimes and that there really is no

22:40

justification for it and World War II history is so important because one

22:46

thing that's often not noted about World War II and about the US's behavior is that when those nuclear warheads when

22:53

those bombs were dropped on Hiroshima Nagasaki it was already well known that ja

22:59

was gearing up to surrender that the firebombing that the United States had already partaken in had crushed them and

23:05

that the Soviets right in the manua region for example were marching and the

23:11

reason why the United States dropped those bombs because it did not want to

23:16

give the Soviet Union credit for helping to uh end this war but also wanted to

23:23

send a message to the Soviet Union that the next phase of its EMP Empire was

23:29

coming into fruition which was the Cold War that this was a message to the Soviet Union that the Soviet Union

23:35

shouldn't get too comfortable being on the same side of the United States because that was going to be reversed

23:41

very soon that is the reason why the United States dropped those bombs it was not to defeat Japan Japan Was

23:50

Defeated foreign policy magazine of all places look it up they have discussed

23:56

this they have the receipts this was the real aim and all this is to

24:02

say is that war crimes are war crimes and Israel always gets a pass and the

24:09

United States always gets a pass from people like Pierce Morgan there's always a justification we have to defend

24:16

democracy we have to beat the Nazis but that is never the case the United States

24:23

does not defeat Nazis the United States helps strengthen their hand in place like Ukraine the United States doesn't

24:30

defend or promote democracy it completely obliterates it in coup after

24:36

coup and war after War all over the world is the United States truly

24:42

bringing democracy anywhere right now is it bring a democracy to Gaza Gaza right now is not just an open air prison it is

24:49

an open air prison that's being bombed to Oblivion where people are being

24:55

massacred on a scale that we have not not seen right that we have not seen in

25:00

the modern era if we look at it from the at least from the arena of proportions

25:07

proportionality like the the proportion of people that are being killed in Gaza is just

25:12

astronomical and it's just so infuriating it's so

25:19

infuriating that people like Piers Morgan Get this kind of morality past

25:26

that they because they are giving some kind of of liberal argument they're against war crimes in general they don't

25:33

like what Israel is doing in some respects and then they go up in I think

25:39

it's kind of insulting speak to someone like John Mir shimer a political scientist of many decades someone who's written dozens and dozens and dozens of

25:46

books and articles a real researcher someone who's written about the Israel Lobby in the United States this is

25:52

someone who knows his stuff and you try to debate and argue with him about

25:59

whether it's justifiable to commit war crimes that's not even intellectually a

26:05

valuable conversation because all you have to do is look at the UN Charter all you have to do is look at international

26:11

law and you can say see that there is absolutely no justification for any war

26:17

crimes you because for example if you look at let's say the right to Armed

26:23

resistance for occupied people which is in the UN char

26:29

that resistance is not a war crime that resistance is actually self-defense war crimes are offensive operations usually

26:37

take that take part that are uh uh uh uh that are the result of brutal force from

26:44

a more powerful aggressor that's generally how it goes Wars are never fought have we ever fought has there

26:51

ever been a war fought in history where both sides are equally as aggressive

26:57

where they're equally at um you know can be said to have started this war no

27:04

usually Wars are about uh one side trying to assert its interests over

27:11

another that's why you could say war in many respects is a reflection of class war because geopolitics is basically an

27:19

essentially class war among nations it's about the bigger Nations the Richer Nations the wealthier Nations uh those

27:26

Nations that are seeking uh uh unmitigated free access to uh PR

27:33

to profit accumulation monopolization economic expansion and those who are not

27:39

that in many respects that's how geopolitics is shaping out China Russia Iran these countries they're not seeking

27:46

unlimited expansion because if they were they would have expanded far beyond where they are now in terms of their

27:53

national interests the United States though the collective West they're everywhere they're in the Solomon

27:59

Islands of all places they're everywhere they are seeking to expand their economic hegemony uh at the expense of

28:07

those Nations that is the nature of War Israel it's not fighting in equal party

28:15

in Gaza Hamas as many people say it doesn't have Hamas and the Palestinian resistance they don't have the same kind

28:21

of Weaponry they don't even have a state however as has been the case in

28:27

history many nations that have been stateless that have been essentially

28:33

colonized dispossessed they have fought Wars too and they have committed acts

28:40

that we would say well that may be morally repugnant but it's not a war crime because it's resistance to

28:45

occupation to dispossession this is the qualitative difference between Empire

28:54

and those who are besieged by Empire that is something thing that John mimer

29:00

understands and his attempt to articulate this to Piers Morgan was Pro probably fell on Lost ears or on deaf

29:09

ears but it didn't fall but many people listen to it and many people could see

29:16

that Piers Morgan was just completely out of his league so all in

29:23

all we have to comat and push against this narrative that Iran that uh Hamas

29:29

the pal Palestinian resistants are these kind of boogey men in the region that

29:34

are trying to destroy democracy so the United States and Israel can just do what they want in a way that's just more

29:42

palatable that's what Piers Morgan is trying to say the United States and Israel should wage war on these forces

29:48

it just shouldn't do it in the way that it is doing it this is why they're scapegoating Netanyahu this is why they

29:55

want Israel's government to change it's not to stop the destruction of Gaza it's

30:01

not to stop the horrific war crimes that they're committing it's just to V take

30:07

people's attention away from it take people's eyes off of it all around the world and make it more acceptable to the

30:15

global population I think that ship has sailed but the project the mission of

30:21

the US Empire of the collective West is ongoing and Pier's Morgan is the

30:28

media talking head of that mission the public relations person of that

30:35

mission thank you for tuning in to my latest video I appreciate all of your

30:40

support this channel however needs your help I am seeking to make this channel

30:46

more sustainable in the long term and upgrade necessary equipment to ensure that this work continues onward and

30:53

makes progress to give you all of the geopolitical analysis

30:58

that you all deserve for that reason I'm asking you to become a member of my patreon community at

31:05

patreon.com Danny High Fong you can find that link in the video description or in

31:11

the pinned comment below for whatever amount you choose to give just know you are supporting Independent Media that

31:18

you can't find anywhere else thank you so much and I look forward to the next video

31:25

[Music] he

31:37

he wa wa

 

 

 

Popular posts from this blog

Video: A legal masterpiece from Ralph Wilde on behalf of the Arab League - with Transcript

Israel, Gaza and the Anatomy of Genocide