Arab League shocks the west, humiliates Israel at ICJ

 

 

Video with Transcript: Arab League shocks the west, humiliates Israel at ICJ 

 

 

Transcript  

0:00  

hey call me Louie this is my  

0:04  

spot Lou spot I now respectfully request  

0:08  

Mr President that you call on Dr Ralph Wilde 

0:10  

Wilde senior councel and Advocate to  

0:13  

address the legal questions before the  

0:14  

court thank you I thank Mr I now give  

0:18  

the floor to Mr Ralph wild you have the  

0:21  

floor  

0:24  

Sir Mr President distinguished members  

0:27  

of the court it's a great honor and  

0:30  

privilege to appear before you and to  

0:32  

represent the league of Arab  

0:35  

states the Palestinian people have been  

0:38  

denied the exercise of their legal right  

0:41  

to  

0:42  

self-determination through the more than  

0:44  

Century long violent Colonial racist  

0:48  

effort to establish a nation state  

0:52  

exclusively for the Jewish people in the  

0:54  

land of mandatory  

0:57  

Palestine when this began after the  

0:59  

first first world war the Jewish  

1:01  

population of that land was  

1:04  

11% forcibly implementing Zionism in  

1:08  

this demographic context has necessarily  

1:12  

involved the extermination or forc  

1:16  

displacement of some of the non-jewish  

1:18  

Palestinian  

1:20  

population the exercise of domination  

1:23  

over and subjugation dispossession and  

1:27  

immiseration of remaining non Jewish  

1:31  

Palestinians the immigration to that  

1:33  

land of Jewish people regardless of any  

1:36  

direct personal link and the denial of  

1:39  

Palestinian refugees the right to return  

1:43  

all operating through a racist  

1:45  

distinction privileging Jewish people  

1:48  

over non-jewish Palestinian  

1:51  

people this has necessitated serious  

1:54  

violations of all the fundamental Yos  

1:57  

kogan and erga omn Norms of  

2:00  

international law the right of  

2:04  

self-determination the prohibitions on  

2:06  

aggression genocide crimes against  

2:10  

humanity racial discrimination aparte  

2:13  

and torture and the core protections of  

2:17  

IHL today I will address first  

2:21  

violations of international law arising  

2:24  

out of the regime of racial domination  

2:27  

aparte perpetrated against the  

2:30  

Palestinian people across the entire  

2:33  

land of historic  

2:35  

Palestine and then second the  

2:38  

existential illegality of Israel's  

2:41  

occupation of the Palestinian Gaza Strip  

2:44  

and West Bank including East Jerusalem  

2:47  

since  

2:49  

1967 as a necessary prerequisite I must  

2:53  

begin with this special right granted to  

2:55  

the Palestinian people in the league  

2:58  

Covenant the legal right of  

3:01  

self-determination of the Palestinian  

3:03  

people originates in the sacred trust  

3:06  

obligations of article 22 of the Lee  

3:09  

Covenant part of the Versa  

3:12  

treaty Palestine an A-Class mandate  

3:15  

under British colonial rule was after  

3:19  

the first world war supposed to have its  

3:22  

existence as an independent state  

3:25  

provisionally recognized a su generous  

3:29  

right of  

3:31  

self-determination the UK and other  

3:33  

members of The League Council attempted  

3:36  

to bypass this incorporating the 1917  

3:40  

Bala declaration commitment to  

3:43  

establishing a national home for the  

3:45  

Jewish people in Palestine into the  

3:48  

instrument stipulating how the Mandate  

3:51  

would  

3:52  

operate however the council had no legal  

3:56  

power to bypass the Covenant in this way  

3:59  

it acted ultrav virus and the relevant  

4:02  

Provisions were legally  

4:05  

void there was and is no legal basis in  

4:10  

that mandate instrument for either a  

4:13  

specifically Jewish state in Palestine  

4:17  

or the UK's failure to discharge the  

4:20  

sacred trust obligation to implement  

4:23  

Palestinian  

4:27  

self-determination after the second  

4:29  

world War a self-determination right  

4:32  

applicable to Colonial peoples generally  

4:35  

crystallized in international law for  

4:38  

the Palestinian people this essentially  

4:41  

corresponded to and supplemented the  

4:45  

pre-existing Covenant right regarding  

4:47  

the same single  

4:50  

territory the 1947 proposal to partition  

4:54  

Palestine was contrary to this the Arab  

4:57  

rejection and affirmation of the legal  

5:00  

status quo in 1948 then Palestine was  

5:06  

legally a single territory with a single  

5:10  

population enjoying a right of  

5:12  

self-determination on a unitary  

5:15  

basis despite this a state of Israel  

5:19  

specifically for Jewish people was  

5:22  

proclaimed in  

5:23  

1948 by those controlling  

5:27  

78% more than 34 ERS of Palestine  

5:32  

accompanied by the forc displacement of  

5:34  

a significant number of the non-jewish  

5:36  

Palestinian population the nacba  

5:41  

catastrophe this illegal secession was  

5:44  

an egregious violation of Palestinian  

5:48  

self-determination Israel's statehood  

5:50  

was recognized and Israel admitted as a  

5:53  

UN member despite this  

5:57  

illegality Israel is not the legal  

6:00  

continuation or successor of the  

6:03  

Mandate this violation of Palestinian  

6:06  

self-determination is ongoing and  

6:09  

unresolved two key elements are First  

6:14  

Palestinian people not displaced from  

6:17  

the land proclaimed to be of Israel in  

6:20  

48 and their  

6:22  

descendants have been forced to live as  

6:25  

Citizens presently they constitute 17.2%  

6:30  

of a state conceived to be of and for  

6:34  

another racial group under the  

6:37  

domination of that group necessarily  

6:40  

treated as second class because of their  

6:44  

race second Palestinian people displaced  

6:48  

from that land and their descendants  

6:51  

cannot  

6:53  

return these are serious breaches of the  

6:56  

right of  

6:57  

self-determination the prohibition s of  

6:59  

racial discrimination and aparte and the  

7:03  

right of return they must end  

7:07  

immediately as if this ongoing nabba was  

7:11  

not catastrophic enough in  

7:14  

1967 Israel captured the remaining 22%  

7:18  

of historic Palestine the Gaza Strip and  

7:21  

West Bank including East Jerusalem the  

7:25  

naxa it's maintained that use of force  

7:29  

to remain in control for the 57-year  

7:33  

period  

7:35  

since for more than half a century then  

7:38  

a state defined to be of and for Jewish  

7:42  

people  

7:43  

exclusively has governed the entire land  

7:46  

of historic Palestine and the  

7:49  

Palestinian people there and the regime  

7:52  

of racial domination aparte and denying  

7:55  

return has been extended throughout in  

7:59  

the case of Palestinians living in the  

8:01  

occupied territory this has involved the  

8:04  

same serious violations of international  

8:07  

law supplemented by serious violations  

8:11  

of norms applicable in occupied  

8:14  

territory indeed these people are  

8:17  

subject to an even more extreme form of  

8:21  

racist domination as they aren't even  

8:24  

citizens of the state exercising  

8:27  

authority over them  

8:30  

even in East Jerusalem which Israel has  

8:33  

purported to Annex the majority  

8:35  

non-jewish Palestinian residents don't  

8:38  

have  

8:39  

citizenship whereas Jewish residents  

8:42  

including illegal settlers are  

8:45  

citizens just as in territorial Israel  

8:49  

in occupied territory these serious  

8:53  

violations concerning how Israel  

8:55  

exercises authority over the Palestinian  

8:58  

people  

9:00  

must end  

9:02  

immediately however here a more  

9:06  

fundamental matter must also be  

9:10  

addressed the illegality of the exercise  

9:14  

of authority  

9:17  

itself the enduring Palestinian right of  

9:21  

self-determination means that the  

9:23  

Palestinian people and the state of  

9:25  

Palestine not Israel are sovereign over  

9:29  

the territory Israel captured in '  

9:32  

67 for Israel the land is extr  

9:36  

Territorial and given what I said about  

9:39  

the Mandate territory over which it has  

9:42  

no legal Sovereign  

9:45  

entitlement despite this Israel has  

9:48  

purported to Annex East Jerusalem and  

9:51  

taken various actions there and in the  

9:54  

rest of the West Bank constituting deure  

9:57  

and de facto purported  

9:59  

annexation including implanting  

10:02  

settlements it is Israeli policy that  

10:06  

Israel should be not only the exclusive  

10:10  

authority over the entire land between  

10:13  

the river and the sea but also the  

10:15  

exclusive Sovereign Authority  

10:19  

there this constitutes a complete  

10:23  

repudiation of Palestinian  

10:26  

self-determination as a legal right  

10:29  

since it empties the right entirely of  

10:32  

any territorial  

10:35  

content actualizing this through de  

10:38  

facto and deure purported annexation is  

10:42  

first a serious violation of Palestinian  

10:46  

self-determination and  

10:49  

second because it's a uh enabled through  

10:54  

the use of force a violation of the  

10:57  

prohibition on the purported acquisition  

10:59  

of territory through the use of force in  

11:02  

the law on the use of force and so an  

11:06  

aggression serious violations of further  

11:09  

areas of law regulating the conduct of  

11:12  

the occupation are also being  

11:15  

perpetrated notably the prohibitions on  

11:18  

implanting settlements and altering  

11:21  

unless absolutely prevented the legal  

11:24  

political social and religious status  

11:27  

quo the OCC occupation is therefore  

11:30  

existentially illegal because of its use  

11:34  

to actualize purported  

11:37  

annexation to end this serious  

11:40  

illegality it must be terminated Israel  

11:44  

must renounce all sovereignty claims and  

11:47  

all settlements must be removed  

11:51  

immediately however this is not the only  

11:54  

basis on which the occupation's  

11:56  

existential legality must be  

11:59  

addressed we need to delve deeper into  

12:02  

both the law of  

12:04  

self-determination and the law on the  

12:06  

use of  

12:08  

force beginning with  

12:10  

self-determination this right when  

12:13  

applied to the Palestinian people in the  

12:15  

territory Israel captured in '  

12:18  

67 is a right to be entirely  

12:21  

self-governing free from Israeli  

12:25  

domination consequently the Palestinian  

12:28  

people have a legal right to the  

12:30  

immediate end of the  

12:33  

occupation and Israel has a correlative  

12:36  

legal duty to immediately terminate the  

12:41  

occupation this right exists and  

12:44  

operates simply and exclusively because  

12:48  

the Palestinian people are entitled to  

12:51  

it it does not depend on others agreeing  

12:55  

to its  

12:56  

realization it is a right  

13:00  

it's a repudiation of trusteeship  

13:02  

whereby colonial peoples were ostensibly  

13:05  

to be granted freedom only if and when  

13:08  

they were deemed ready because of their  

13:11  

stage of development determined by the  

13:14  

racist standard of  

13:16  

civilization the anti-colonial  

13:19  

self-determination rule replaced this  

13:22  

with a right based on the automatic  

13:25  

immediate entitlement of all people to  

13:29  

freedom without  

13:32  

preconditions in the words of general  

13:34  

assembly  

13:36  

1514 inadequacy of preparedness should  

13:40  

never serve as a pretext for delaying  

13:45  

Independence some suggest that the  

13:47  

Palestinian people were offered and  

13:49  

rejected deals that could have ended the  

13:53  

occupation and therefore Israel can  

13:55  

maintain it pending a settlement even  

13:59  

assuming arguendo the veracity of this  

14:02  

account the deals involved a further  

14:06  

loss of The Sovereign territory of the  

14:08  

Palestinian  

14:10  

People Israel cannot lawfully demand  

14:14  

concessions on Palestinian rights as the  

14:17  

price for ending its impediment to  

14:20  

Palestinian  

14:22  

Freedom this would mean Israel using  

14:25  

Force to coerce the Palestinian people  

14:29  

to give up some of their peremptory  

14:31  

legal  

14:32  

rights illegal in the law on the use of  

14:36  

force and necessarily voiding the  

14:40  

relevant terms of any agreement  

14:43  

reached the Palestinian people are  

14:46  

legally entitled to reject a further  

14:49  

loss of land over which they have an  

14:52  

exclusive legal peremptory  

14:56  

right any such rejection  

14:59  

makes no difference to Israel's  

15:02  

immediate legal obligation to end the  

15:06  

occupation turning to the law on the use  

15:09  

of  

15:09  

force Israel's control over the  

15:12  

Palestinian territory since ' 67 as a  

15:15  

military occupation is an ongoing use of  

15:19  

force as such its existential legality  

15:23  

is determined by the law on the use of  

15:26  

force as a general matter beyond the  

15:29  

specific issue of  

15:32  

annexation Israel captured the Gaza  

15:34  

Strip and West Bank from Egypt and  

15:36  

Jordan in the war it launched against  

15:39  

them and  

15:41  

Syria it claimed to be acting in  

15:44  

self-defense anticipating a non  

15:46  

immediately imminent  

15:48  

attack the war was over after 6 days  

15:53  

peace treaties between Israel and Egypt  

15:55  

and Jordan were subsequently adopted  

15:59  

despite this Israel maintained control  

16:02  

of the territory continuing the use of  

16:05  

force enabling its  

16:08  

capture Israel's 67 war was illegal in  

16:11  

the Yad Bellum even assuming arguendo  

16:16  

its claim of a feared attack States  

16:19  

can't lawfully use force in non  

16:22  

immediately imminent anticipatory  

16:26  

self-defense Alterna ly assuming again  

16:30  

arguendo that the war was  

16:33  

lawful the justification ended after 6  

16:38  

days however the Yos ad Bellum  

16:41  

requirements continued to apply to the  

16:44  

occupation as itself A continuing use of  

16:49  

force in 1967 with self-determination  

16:53  

well established in international law  

16:57  

states could not lawfully use Force to  

17:00  

retain control over a self-determination  

17:04  

unit captured in war unless the legal  

17:08  

test justifying the initial use of force  

17:13  

also Justified on the same basis the use  

17:17  

of force in retaining  

17:20  

control moreover this justification  

17:24  

would need to  

17:25  

continue not only in the immediate after  

17:28  

math but for more than half a  

17:33  

century  

17:34  

manifestly This legal test has not been  

17:39  

met Israel's exercise of control over  

17:42  

the Gaza Strip and West Bank through the  

17:45  

use of force has been illegal in the Yos  

17:48  

ad Bellum since the capture of the  

17:50  

territory or at least very soon after  

17:55  

afterwards the occupation is there  

17:58  

therefore again existentially illegal in  

18:01  

the law on the use of force and  

18:04  

aggression this time as a general matter  

18:08  

Beyond illegality specific to  

18:11  

annexation to terminate this serious  

18:14  

violation the occupation must likewise  

18:17  

end  

18:19  

immediately what of Israel's current  

18:22  

military action in  

18:24  

Gaza this is not a war that began in  

18:28  

October  

18:31  

2023 it's a drastic scaling up of the  

18:35  

force exercised there and in the West  

18:38  

Bank on a continual basis since  

18:42  

67 a justification for a new phase in an  

18:47  

ongoing illegal use of force cannot be  

18:51  

constructed solely out of the  

18:54  

consequences of violent resistance to  

18:57  

that illegal use use of  

18:59  

force otherwise an illegal use of force  

19:02  

would be rendered lawful because those  

19:05  

subject to it violently resisted  

19:08  

circular logic with a perverse  

19:12  

outcome more generally Israel cannot  

19:15  

lawfully use Force to control the  

19:18  

Palestinian territory for security  

19:20  

purposes pending an agreement providing  

19:23  

security  

19:25  

guarantees states can only lawfully used  

19:29  

Force outside their borders in extremely  

19:32  

narrow  

19:34  

circumstances beyond that they must  

19:37  

address they must address security  

19:40  

concerns non  

19:43  

forcibly the USA UK and Zambia suggested  

19:48  

here that there is a sue generous  

19:51  

applicable legal  

19:52  

framework an Israeli Palestinian Lex  

19:57  

specialis this somehow supersedes the  

20:00  

rules of international law determining  

20:03  

whether the occupation is existentially  

20:07  

lawful instead we have a new rule  

20:11  

justifying the occupation until there is  

20:13  

a peace agreement meeting Israeli  

20:16  

security  

20:18  

needs this is the law as these states  

20:22  

would like it to be not the law as it  

20:27  

is it has no basis in resolution 242  

20:32  

Oslo or any other resolutions or  

20:36  

agreements  

20:38  

actually you are being invited to do  

20:42  

away with the very operation of some of  

20:45  

the fundamental peremptory rules of  

20:49  

international law  

20:51  

itself as a result the matters these  

20:55  

rules conceive as rights vested in the  

20:58  

the Palestinian people would be realized  

21:02  

only if agreement is reached and only on  

21:05  

the basis of such  

21:07  

agreement at Best if there is an  

21:10  

agreement this means one that need not  

21:14  

be compatible with Palestinian  

21:16  

peremptory legal rights determined only  

21:20  

by the acute power imbalance in Israel's  

21:24  

favor at worst if there is no agreement  

21:29  

this means that the indefinite  

21:31  

continuation of Israeli rule over the  

21:34  

Palestinian people in the  

21:36  

opt on the basis of racist Supremacy and  

21:40  

a claim to sovereignty would be  

21:44  

lawful this is an affront to the  

21:48  

international rule of law to the UN  

21:52  

Charter imperative to settle disputes in  

21:55  

Conformity with international law  

21:59  

and to your judicial function as  

22:02  

Guardians of the international legal  

22:06  

system a final potential basis sometimes  

22:10  

invoked to justify continuing the  

22:12  

occupation should be  

22:14  

addressed occupation and human rights  

22:16  

law applicable to illegal and lawful  

22:20  

occupations  

22:22  

alike oblige Israel to address security  

22:26  

threats in occupied territor  

22:29  

however they only regulate the conduct  

22:32  

of an occupation when it exists they  

22:36  

don't also provide a legal basis for  

22:38  

that existence  

22:41  

itself existential legality is  

22:43  

determined by the law of  

22:45  

self-determination and the Yos ad Bellum  

22:48  

only there is no backdoor legal basis  

22:53  

for Israel to maintain the occupation  

22:55  

through the imperatives of occupa and  

22:58  

human rights  

23:00  

law in some the occupation of the  

23:04  

Palestinian Gaza Strip and West Bank  

23:06  

including East Jerusalem is  

23:09  

existentially illegal on two mutually  

23:12  

reinforcing  

23:14  

bases first the law on the use of force  

23:19  

here the occupation is illegal both as a  

23:21  

use of force without valid  

23:24  

justification and because it's enabling  

23:27  

an illegal purported  

23:29  

annexation as such it is an  

23:32  

aggression second the law of  

23:36  

self-determination here it's illegal  

23:38  

again because of the association with  

23:40  

illegal purported  

23:42  

annexation and also more generally  

23:45  

because it is quite simply an exercise  

23:49  

of authority over the Palestinian people  

23:52  

that by its very nature violates their  

23:56  

right to Freedom  

23:58  

this multifaceted existential illegality  

24:02  

involving serious violations of  

24:04  

peremptory Norms has two key  

24:08  

consequences first the occupation must  

24:10  

end Israel must renounce its claim to  

24:13  

sovereignty over the Palestinian  

24:15  

territory all settlers must be  

24:18  

removed  

24:20  

immediately this is required to end the  

24:23  

illegality to discharge the positive  

24:25  

obligation to enable immediate  

24:27  

Palestinian  

24:29  

self-administration and because Israel  

24:32  

lacks any legal entitlement to exercise  

24:37  

Authority second in the absence of the  

24:40  

occupation ending  

24:42  

necessarily everything Israel does in  

24:45  

the Palestinian territory lacks a valid  

24:49  

International legal basis and is  

24:53  

therefore subject to the Namibia  

24:55  

exception invalid not only those things  

24:59  

violating the law regulating the conduct  

25:02  

of the  

25:04  

occupation those Norms entitle and  

25:06  

require Israel to do certain things but  

25:10  

this doesn't alter the more fundamental  

25:12  

position from the law on the use of  

25:15  

force and  

25:16  

self-determination that Israel lacks any  

25:19  

valid authority to do anything and  

25:23  

whatever it does is illegal even if  

25:27  

comping with or pursuant to the conduct  

25:31  

regulatory  

25:34  

rules I will close by quoting  

25:37  

Palestinian academic and poet rafat  

25:41  

allara from his final poem posted 36  

25:45  

days before he was killed by Israel in  

25:48  

Gaza on the 6th of December  

25:55  

2023 if I must die  

25:58  

you must live to tell my  

26:02  

story if I must die let it bring  

26:07  

hope let it be a  

26:11  

story thank you for your  

26:13  

attention that sums it up for this video  

26:16  

did you like or do you hate what you  

26:18  

just watched share your thoughts and  

26:21  

opinions in the comment section below I  

26:24  

encourage having a proper discussion on  

26:26  

matters like this without having me  

26:28  

impose my opinions and ideas on this  

26:31  

matter otherwise give this video a  

26:33  

thumbs up if you liked it that's the  

26:34  

only way YouTube can know this video so  

26:35  

much interesting and share it out there  

26:37  

to more Aid viewers just like you make  

26:41  

sure to subscribe to this channel if you  

26:42  

also have not done so and click the  

26:44  

notification Bell so us to be notified  

26:46  

as soon as I make new uploads on videos  

26:49  

just like this my name is Lou until next  

26:53  

time peace out 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Video: A legal masterpiece from Ralph Wilde on behalf of the Arab League - with Transcript

Israel, Gaza and the Anatomy of Genocide